Not sure if I've mentioned this, but the focus of my project has changed quite a bit. I'm now looking at the intersection between education reform and providing employable skills to young people. That means both college graduates whose degrees haven't prepared them for the job market, as well as secondary school students who might be looking for a vocational education program. So I'm looking at what sorts of systemic reforms are necessary in both the vocational education system in India (which on the books is pretty well developed but in practice only serviecs a minute number of students) and the higher ed system. I think as time goes on the focus of whatever I'm researching/writing will have to become a lot more narrow. One of the big issues is how to tailor the vocational education system to the informal sector (which is where over 90% of the jobs are still located).
Okay...again some excerpts from my journal about the past few days:
8 October 2006
Today is Sunday; we met with Dr. Rao Chelikani, the president of the International Foundation for Human Development. I think the “international tag” comes from Dr. Rao’s ties to Paris and prior affiliation with UNESCO, but we primarily looked at his organization’s work in Tarnaka. Tarnaka, in the far eastern reaches of Hyderabad, falls under the 100th (and last) ward in Hyderabad, and it’s apparently also the ward with the highest number of resident PhDs. My initial impression was that such a highly educated community would be more receptive to collective civic action, but Karthik was of the opinion that they are the least willing to organize. That might make sense; if they enjoy a high standard of living (as well as an urbane cynicism) there’s far less at stake.
At any rate, Dr. Rao and a number of individuals have succeeded in getting a drainage system for Tarnaka, have built a pretty decent rapport with the policemen, and have a set up a system where Ward Sabha leaders can directly approach municipal officials to discuss their problems. This bypasses the normal procedure of filing an application, only to have it disappear from sight. I think this is yet another indication that institutions are only as strong as the personal relationships cultivated between “ordinary citizens” and the individuals that staff those institutions. We spent the Indicorps orientation discussing the importance of personal relationships at length, but for some reason when it comes to governance it’s easy to get lost in abstract discussion of institutions and service delivery. I don’t know why I never thought of our “personal relationships” discussion in this context. For some reason I only thought about these relationships on an “equal” footing and never as cutting across official power dynamics. But maybe what Dr. Rao is talking about is the only way to effect real governance reform; the distinction between government official and citizen has to break down if one wants a truly responsive government.
Dr. Rao and IFHD have also done a number of other interesting things that fit more neatly into my conception of relationship-building. One of their experiments is in creating a strong flat culture – basically he has organized (and other volunteers have followed suit in their own apartment buildings) activities to bring the residents closer together, resolve minor disputes, and also a system in which children are responsible for maintenance of community space via a self-governing system. Pretty impressive stuff.
Dr. Rao was also quite eager to explain his own brand of political theory. In his view, human communication is beginning to conclusively supplant political power, which means the state ought to recede from our daily lives. (An example of this are the direct discussions that Tarnaka Ward Sabha members have with municipal officials to resolve their dispute. A better example might be two citizens who figure out a way to solve some community problem on their own.) In the age of high-speed, distance communication, Dr. Rao thinks the state has become obsolete. However, he was also quick to say that in India, the bulk of people only obey naked power and so the state’s role hasn’t yet been completely obviated. But the state should recede from its “interference” in daily lives because politicians, to paraphrase Dr. Rao, are no more qualified to govern than the people. I asked him if the homogenizing effects of the state (via mass literacy, standardization of education campaigns) are precisely what make the application of direct communication possible. He seemed to agree; so it’s kind of paradoxical but perfectly logical – that state has set the stage for its own waning power. Dr. Rao, like many other people, thinks that the trend is toward smaller government that’s also farther away – regional and international governments.
I’m always struck by people’s ideological pronouncements in India; they are often charged with a particularly strong idealistic fervor. Somehow I think there’s a much more vibrant link between sentiment and philosophy, whereas among intelligentsia in the U.S. pragmatism (or cynicism) is much more prevalent. We talked a lot amongst ourselves at Orientation about how people in India have a much higher stake in change than in the U.S. I think the fact that people speak so passionately about ideals here is a reflection of that deeper investment. That sense of urgency and investiture is palpable even in what people like Dr. Rao (who is in all likelihood quite wealthy) have to say. In a lot of ways that kind of emotional investiture in change and in political ideals is exciting and can be a real driver of progress. I'm not suggesting that people don't care passionately about their ideals in the U.S., I'm just noting a few differences.
On a lighter note...here's an amusing picture I took on the way to IFHD's office in Tarnaka. THIS is how to advertise...promise realistic goals, like losing 6 inches in 90 minutes. Why not?

12 October 2006
Today I visited the Advanced Training Institute (ATI) in Vidyanagar along with Prakash-garu, a volunteer in the Lok Satta office. He’s a really great guy, and an amazingly hard worker. He wakes up every day at 3:30, works a 4am-7am shift with a Telugu newspaper near his home in Dilsukhnagar, then makes the two-hour commute to the Lok Satta office in Punjagutta, and leaves there at 6 PM. He only works with Lok Satta on an as-needed basis, though. Since the party formation has generated so much work, he’s here regularly now. But all that could change. It was absolutely great to leave the office with a purpose, and to get to know Prakash a lot better. We left around 2:30, jumped on an east-bound bus , switched buses not too far from Secunderabad Railway Station, and eventually made it to the ATI campus by about 3:45 or 4 PM. By the way, no one believes in north-south directions in India, it's all right left, here there. Nevertheless, I still insist on referring to things in terms of direction!
Anyway...Prakash took an auto mechanic training course at another institute on that campus, the Vocational Rehabilitation Centre for Handicapped. We initially had no luck in finding anyone on the ATI campus to speak with, so we went to the Vocational Rehabilitation Centre, where he introduced me to his old teacher. He, in turn, introduced me to S.M. Karimuddin, the man who runs the Centre. Though my primary purpose was to find out about ATI, I ended up getting better information on the Rehabilitation Centre. VRCH was founded in 1968 with the intention of developing an evaluation and training program for “differently abled” people to be able to adjust to the job market. The U.S. government provided some guidance to the program, apparently. Both VRCH, ATI, and a couple of other programs on that campus all fall under the jurisdiction of the Directorate General of Employment and Training, which in turn falls under the Minsitry of Labour.
The primary focus of VRCH is on people with progressive-nature disabilities (less emphasis on permanent disability, and almost none on temporary), because as their condition is always in flux they need a strategy to adapt to their working environments. VRCH conducts a four-step evaluation process: medical, socioeconomic, psychological, and finally, a work-related evaluation. Following this, they suggest that the individual follow one of three tracks:
1) Salaried employment in either government or private sectors. VRCH will canvass for these people and try to find something suitable.
2) Training programs, either formal training like in an ITI (Industrial Training Institute), non-formal training which is offered through VRCH, or apprenticeships
3) Self-employment in small-scale ventures
After the individual leaves VRCH, there is a follow-up to make sure that the ex-trainees are adequately adjusted and in a good situation. On paper, certainly, this is a fantastic system. But Prakash-garu was telling me that there’s less and less demand for ATI and VRCH because students who graduate struggled to find jobs. They were unlikely to get bank loans needed to start small-scale ventures, and their skills were not in demand at larger outfits.
After a twenty minute chat, S.M. Karimuddin then took me to another building to meet his friend at ATI, whose name is either M.K. Parial or Parikal. We waited for about twenty minutes and then Parikal arrived. Disappointingly, he had no literature to give me, but he explained that there are four national schemes that the Institute runs:
1) Craft Instructor Schemes, which run 3 different modules to train the people who teach in ITIs (state-run).
2) Model Training Institute, which issues National Trade Certificates for any vocation.
3) Craftsman Training Scheme
4) Industry Technician Training, which consists of short courses (a few weeks) designed to provide skill-upgradation. These programs are tailor-made to meet industries’ need, either done through tie-ups with those industries, or simply on the basis of ATI’s study of what those industries need. They do occasionally use certain industries’ facilities to supplement their training, as well.
Karthik wanted me to find out about the social composition of ATI, which he suspected was largely rural. But it turns out that it’s just the opposite – since most of the people are coming through government organiations or specific industries, the bulk of them are from urban areas. There are a number of people at the Hyderabad ATI from all over the country, as well as from Andhra Pradesh. Students at ATI who come from rural areas are primarily “private” candidates – that is, they have no affiliation to a company or government agency.
After we finished at ATI Prakash and I went to a cafĂ© for chai (him) and Coke (still-vegan me). He’s incredibly nice, invited me to his house and his office at the newspaper as well. I’ll definitely take him up on both at some point. Even though the ATI visit itself wasn’t incredibly fruitful, I was quite excited to be doing something related to my project, to be interacting with people, and getting closer to someone at the office. All in all a heartening day…
Today’s Friday the 13th, I’m not normally a suspicious guy, but I’m happy to report nothing bad seems to have happened here at least. Heard about the airplane crash on the Upper East Side, though. Terrible…
I hope everyone’s doing well. I’ll post again within a week’s time.